BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//History and Philosophy of Science Events - ECPv6.17.1//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-WR-CALNAME:History and Philosophy of Science Events
X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://hps-events.sydney.edu.au
X-WR-CALDESC:Events for History and Philosophy of Science Events
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-Robots-Tag:noindex
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:UTC
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
TZNAME:UTC
DTSTART:20250101T000000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=UTC:20260504T173000
DTEND;TZID=UTC:20260504T183000
DTSTAMP:20260422T071115Z
CREATED:20260422T070948Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20260422T071115Z
UID:192-1777915800-1777919400@hps-events.sydney.edu.au
SUMMARY:PTSD in Australia from DSM-III to the Royal Commission into Defence and Veteran Suicide (2021-2024) - Effie Karageorges (The University of Newcastle)
DESCRIPTION:Effie Karageorgos\nAbstract: In 1980\, the American Psychiatric Association published the third edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-III)\, which introduced post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)\, a new psychiatric category applicable to both civilian and veteran trauma. PTSD differed from previous DSM classifications such as ‘gross stress reaction’ in DSM-I of 1952 and ‘transient situational disturbance’ in 1968’s DSM-II by its insistence that such trauma was not related to personality\, but rather ‘normal’ responses to a stressful event. Although this definition harked back to Freudian conceptualisations of ‘psychic trauma’\, it was bound by a set of guidelines in line with the neo-Kraepelinian approach of DSM-III. For the military veteran\, this new definition was revolutionary\, removing – officially\, at least – the suggestion common during the First and Second World Wars that traumatic symptoms were caused by faults in individual or hereditary makeup. In Australia\, the Department of Veterans Affairs began recognising PTSD as a pensionable condition from the early 1980s\, but it was not until the 1990s that Australian veterans mounted a collective approach to advocating for the recognition and pensioning of veteran trauma\, predominantly through the Vietnam Veterans Association of Australia (VVAA).  Since this period\, advocacy by the VVAA and other organisations has promoted the biomedical model of veteran trauma in alignment with the DSM\, ensuring that veterans retain their respectability as ex-soldiers\, while insisting on life-centred treatment options reflecting a biopsychosocial model. This paper focuses on the Australian example\, where the foregrounding of military histories within national identity has led to a specific framing of the masculine soldier ‘hero’ that allows little room for men ‘weakened’ by trauma. Despite tireless advocacy by veteran organisations from the 1980s\, the recent Royal Commission into Defence and Veteran Suicide tells us that the Australian Defence Force (ADF) remains attached to this framing and is yet to embrace the necessarily multifaced approach to ensure quality of life for traumatised military personnel. \nBio: Effie Karageorgos is a historian whose work focuses on conflict\, violence\, protest\, gender and psychiatry. She is Deputy Co-Director of the UON Centre for Society\, Health and Care Research\, co-editor of Health and History journal and co-investigator on the ARC project ‘Life outside institutions: histories of mental health aftercare 1900 – 1960’ led by Catharine Coleborne. With Natalie Hendry (University of Melbourne)\, she coordinates the Social Production of Mental Health seminar series\, which has formed the basis of their recent edited book Critical Mental Health in Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand: Social and Historical Perspectives (Palgrave\, 2025). Her latest book Quiet Protest: A New History of Activism in the Vietnam War is published by UNSW Press in April 2026.
URL:https://hps-events.sydney.edu.au/event/ptsd-in-australia-from-dsm-iii-to-the-royal-commission-into-defence-and-veteran-suicide-2021-2024-effie-karageorges-the-university-of-newcastle/
LOCATION:Carslaw Building Lecture Theatre 275\, Carslaw Building (F07)\, Level 2\, Room 275\, The University of Sydney\, NSW\, 2006\, Australia
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=UTC:20260601T130000
DTEND;TZID=UTC:20260611T170000
DTSTAMP:20260522T023445Z
CREATED:20260522T023445Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20260522T023445Z
UID:206-1780318800-1781197200@hps-events.sydney.edu.au
SUMMARY:HPS Research Day @ The Sybil Centre
DESCRIPTION:The School of History and Philosophy of Science Researh Day\nJune 1st\, Monday afternoon\, at the Sybil Centre (Women’s College)\,\n15 Carillon Avenue on the Newtown side of campus\n\n\n\nTime\nSpeaker\nTitle\n\n\n1.00pm\nDominic Murphy\nIntroduction and overview\n\n\n1.15pm\nJo Richards\nThe Ecological Niche Metaphor and the Rise of Western Anorexia Nervosa in Hong Kong\n\n\n1.45pm\nJax Gill\nThe ADHD Discrepancy: An Approach for Reconciling Biology and Historical Emergence in Psychiatry\n\n\n2.15pm\nStefan Gawronski\nUexküll’s Animals: The Experimental Origins of the Umwelt\n\n\n3.00pm\nRefreshment break\n\n\n\n3.30pm\nCaitrin Donovan\nOthered Minds: Intelligibility\, Niche Construction\, and the Social-Cognitive Function of Psychiatry\n\n\n4.15pm\nTsung-Jen Hung (Edward)\nThe Jamu-ization of Dog Meat and Snakes: Negotiating Purity and Moral Worlds in Java’s Therapeutic Landscape\n\n\n5.00pm\nBREAK\n\n\n\n5.30pm\nPaul Griffiths\nSex as a Process\n\n\n7.00pm\nPizza at The Rose (Cleveland St)
URL:https://hps-events.sydney.edu.au/event/hps-research-day-the-sybil-centre/
LOCATION:The Sibyl Centre\, 15 Carillon Avenue\, Newtown\, NSW\, 2042\, Australia
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=UTC:20260601T173000
DTEND;TZID=UTC:20260601T183000
DTSTAMP:20260522T020839Z
CREATED:20260522T020839Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20260522T020839Z
UID:198-1780335000-1780338600@hps-events.sydney.edu.au
SUMMARY:Sex as a Process - Paul E. Griffiths - University of Sydney and Macquarie University
DESCRIPTION:Abstract: Biological sex is defined by anisogamy: males produce small gametes\, females large gametes. This definition has been criticised as a ‘sex binary’ harmful to sexual and gender minorities. Such criticism conflates gametic sex\, which is binary\, with phenotypic sex\, which is not. There are two gametic sexes\, but many kinds of sexed bodies combining sexes in different ways. \nIn a well-meaning effort to support diverse communities\, many theorists have sought to increase the number of sexes. But there is a better solution. That is to realise that sexes are phenotypes. They are not present in miniature in the fertilised egg. Just like arms\, livers or musical ability\, sexes have to grow. Sex is a process. \nBecause sexes are phenotypes\, chromosomes\, nest temperatures and other sex-determining mechanisms may cause the sex of an individual\, but they cannot constitute the sex of that individual\, any more than the gene for blue eyes can be a blue eye. \nThis developmental perspective on sex provides a framework for understanding both the evolved diversity of sexed bodies across species and the open-ended\, idiosyncratic diversity of sexed bodies within a single species. \nBio: Emeritus Professor Paul Griffiths was formerly Challis Professor of Philosophy at the University of Sydney. He has been both a Laureate Fellow (2018) and a Federation Fellow (2007) of the Australian Research Council. He is a Fellow of the Australian Academy of the Humanities\, the American Association for the Advancement of Science\, and the Royal Society of NSW\, and was awarded the RSNSW Medal for History and Philosophy of Science in 2019.  He was twice appointed to the Australian Health Ethics Committee\, a Principal Committee of NHMRC (2006-9\, 2009-12). \nIn 2022 Paul received the Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences Research Leadership Award and was named in a Stanford University study as amongst the top 2% of influential academics worldwide. He retired at the beginning of 2024 and in addition to his Emeritus position at University of Sydney he is a Senior Research Fellow in the School  of Humanities at Macquarie University\, where he continues to hold research grants. \n 
URL:https://hps-events.sydney.edu.au/event/sex-as-a-process-paul-e-griffiths-university-of-sydney-and-macquarie-university/
LOCATION:The Sibyl Centre\, 15 Carillon Avenue\, Newtown\, NSW\, 2042\, Australia
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=UTC:20260803T173000
DTEND;TZID=UTC:20260803T183000
DTSTAMP:20260729T055001Z
CREATED:20260729T054236Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20260729T055001Z
UID:220-1785778200-1785781800@hps-events.sydney.edu.au
SUMMARY:Proprioception and Knowledge of the External World in the Long 18th Century - Antonia LoLordo - University of Virginia
DESCRIPTION:Abstract:  Mary Shepherd says that motion (or the power of motion) is a sixth sense (or sixth sense organ).  I argue that she is talking about proprioception.  Shepherd thus holds that proprioception plays a crucial role in acquiring knowledge of the external world\, as well as in acquiring the concepts involved.  I further argue that proprioception plays a role in knowledge of the external world for many of her predecessors as well—for example\, the Berkeley of the New Theory\, Condillac\, Hume\, and Reid—although unlike Shepherd\, they do not distinguish proprioception from the sense of touch. \nBio:  Antonia LoLordo is George C. and Clare F. Downing Memorial Professor at the University of Virginia.  Her work includes Pierre Gassendi and the Birth of Early Modern Philosophy (Cambridge)\, Locke’s Moral Man (Oxford)\, an edition of Mary Shepherd’s Essays on the Perception of an External Universe (Oxford)\, and Mary Shepherd (Cambridge)\, as well as articles on Cugoano\, Descartes\, Edwards\, Gassendi\, Hume\, Locke\, Malebranche\, and Shepherd.  She is currently working on a book on proprioception and knowledge of the external world in the 18th century.
URL:https://hps-events.sydney.edu.au/event/proprioception-and-knowledge-of-the-external-world-in-the-long-18th-century/
LOCATION:Madsen Room 331\, Madsen Building F09\, The University of Sydney\, NSW\, 2006\, Australia
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR